There are two perspectives on Damien Comolli, the new Liverpool Sporting Director.
He is the man who was sacked as Sporting Director of Tottenham Hotspur with the club laying bottom of the Premier League. Current Spurs manager Harry Redknapp has said that he came to Spurs and found the club in shambles.
He is also the man credited with bringing to Spurs Hurelho Gomes, Benoit Assou-Ekotto, Luca Modric, Gareth Bale and Roman Pavlyuchenko. You can guess the current combined transfer value of these players - it is probably in the region of £80m - but this value can be added to the £20m profit Spurs already made from Dimitar Berbatov, another of Comolli's signings.
Oh, and you may also know that Spurs are currently in the Champions League. They just beat the European Champions 3-1 with a team comprised largely of Comolli bargains.
So is Comolli the man who led a famous Premier League club with a rich tradition to the brink of relegation or the man who signed the core of a Champions League team and added £100m+ of value to his boss's business?
The first step we should make in reaching a conclusion is to figure out what is the responsibility of a Sporting Director. Well, the precise nature of the role is unclear, but in large part he/she will look after a club's transfer operations, like a General Manager in North American sports. He/she signs players whom are considered beneficial to the club. To list: Scouting? SD's responsibility. Transfer offers? SD's responsibility. Contract negotiations? SD's responsibility.
What a Sporting Director does not do is work on a daily basis with the team. That responsibility is left to the manager. To list: Team selection? Manager's responsibility. Team formation? Manager's responsibility. Team chemistry? Manager's responsibility. Player unhappy? Manager's responsibility.
So we have to examine why Spurs failed during the 07/08 season and for the early part of the 08/09. I analyzed these seasons at the time -
07/08 and early
08/09. Spurs were a team that could perform superbly, but conceded more points from a leading position than perhaps any other team in Premier League history. Their performance were a problem not of player skill but of team chemistry.
So was Comolli responsible for signing selfish players who worked against the team? He was famously criticized by former Spurs manager Martin Jol for signing players without discussing signings with the manager. But, and this is important, I simply look at the current success of the Spurs team and see a core of players who were at the club during Comolli's tenure. Gomes in goal, King and Dawson/Kaboul in defence, Modric and Huddlestone in midfield. The current team succeeds with a spine that has been in existence for several years, built in large part by Comolli. The players were capable of succeeding during his tenure.
Could Camolli have done better during his tenure at Spurs? Well the team seemed to succeed largely with his players right after he left, when Redknapp joined the club. One piece was missing - Palacios played a very important role in early 2009. But I would generally concur that Comolli was not responsible for Spurs' on-pitch woes during his time. Redknapp showed this with his immediate success at the club.
So did Camolli succeed at Spurs? I get a sense that there was a lack of communication between him and the club's managers, but yes he succeeded. His job was to sign players, not to manage the team. To put it bluntly, he signed the core of a Champions League team and added £100m+ of value to his boss's business.
What can Liverpool fans expect from Camolli? Camolli has been consistent in excelling at signing young, talented players. Success will not come overnight but in time Liverpool will realize that some of their young talents are world beaters and, with some financial support, Liverpool will once again be in the Champions League. The future will be bright at Anfield.